Former President Donald Trump recently revealed a controversial plan for the Gaza Strip during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Trump's proposal suggests that the U.S. would "take over" and "own" the Gaza Strip. He aims to clear unexploded ordnance and rebuild the area's infrastructure. The plan envisions transforming Gaza into what Trump calls the "Riviera of the Middle East." However, it includes the forcible relocation of the two million Palestinians living there. Under this plan, the U.S. would assume long-term control of Gaza. Trump claims the initiative will bring "peace and harmony." Critics argue that his proposal involves the forced transfer of Palestinians, which violates international laws. Many see this as a potential war crime and a crime against humanity. The Fourth Geneva Convention specifically prohibits such actions. The International Criminal Court (ICC) could hold U.S. personnel accountable for these actions. Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza in 2005, hoping for Palestinian development, but Hamas was elected in 2006 and took control in 2007, leading to increased conflict. Trump's approach marks a significant shift in U.S. policy regarding the Middle East, signaling a potential end to the two-state solution.
The reaction from the region has been overwhelmingly negative. Countries like Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia have strongly rejected Trump's plan. The Arab League has condemned it unanimously. Palestinians have expressed fierce opposition to any forced relocation.
Netanyahu, however, described the plan as "revolutionary and creative."
In the U.S., the political response has been mixed. Democrats have labeled the plan as "insane" and illegal. Some Republicans are waiting for more details. Advocacy group J Street has called it "ethnic cleansing" and a potential war crime. Concerns are growing about how this plan might impact the ongoing ceasefire and hostage releases.
Internationally, the backlash continues. The UN Secretary-General warned that the proposal could lead to ethnic cleansing. EU officials have voiced alarm about the idea of forced transfers. Human rights groups have condemned it as a violation of international law. The plan raises serious questions about its practicality and the future of U.S. relations with Arab allies.
